Re: Pango Performance (was: Re: --gtk-unbuffered)



At 20:51 01.03.01 +0100, egger suse de wrote:
>On  1 Mar, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>
>>  > +  return (1 == has_glyph);
> 
>> It would be preferrable if all of Pango used the same coding style
>> conventions. While I certainly understand the rationale for this style
>> of writing equality tests, it is nonetheless not used in any of the
>> other code, which can be confusing. Or what do others think?
>
> Just curious: Whats the rationale for this "strange way to code"?
> 
Experience :-) The compiler will obviously catch the problem of an
assignment, where a comparsion was intended. I even can't see a violation
of GNU/Pango coding styles with it, but have learned, that it is never a
good idea to contribute a patch hacked after a whole day of work with a
totally differnt coding style ...

Will look into the other suggestions when time and brain permits ...

	Hans
>-- 
>
>Servus,
>       Daniel
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>gtk-devel-list mailing list
>gtk-devel-list gnome org
>http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
>
-------- Hans "at" Breuer "dot" Org -----------
Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to 
get along without it.                -- Dilbert




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]