Re: Pango Performance (was: Re: --gtk-unbuffered)



On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:12:20AM +0100, Oskar Liljeblad wrote:
> On Thursday, March 01, 2001 at 15:53, jrb redhat com wrote:
> > >  Just curious: Whats the rationale for this "strange way to code"?
> > It catches the '=' vs '==' errors.  For instance:
> In my experience, you don't make this mistake often enough for
> it to be a problem. At least not if you're experienced with C...
> I thought the main point in good code was readability, not
> safeness...

Not to mention the fact that if you were smart enough to catch yourself
putting "1 == has_glyph" instead of "has_glyph == 1", you likely aren't
forgetting to use "==" (instead of "=").

As long as the extra braces aren't used, GCC catches this. (I think
somebody else pointed this out as well)

-Wall is your friend.

mark

-- 
mark mielke cc/markm ncf ca/markm nortelnetworks com __________________________
.  .  _  ._  . .   .__    .  . ._. .__ .   . . .__  | Neighbourhood Coder
|\/| |_| |_| |/    |_     |\/|  |  |_  |   |/  |_   | 
|  | | | | \ | \   |__ .  |  | .|. |__ |__ | \ |__  | Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

  One ring to rule them all, one ring to find them, one ring to bring them all
                       and in the darkness bind them...

                           http://mark.mielke.cc/





[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]