Re: Review of accelerator changes

[Tim Janik <timj gtk org>]

On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:

> Tim Janik wrote:
> > 
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2001, Bill Haneman wrote:
> > 
> > > > also, changing accels is not so easy if they need to be combined
> > > > with modifiers by default, and accidental changes can be reverted
> > > > just as easy as the wee made.
> > >
> > > Not if you're a naive user and aren't sure how the change happenned in
> > > the first place.  I predict that we will get zillions of bug reports
> > > about this if it's the default.
> > 
> > we've been having this as default for the last 4 years and did not
> > get zillions of bug reports.
> 
> The plan is for Gnome 2 to have a much wider and more diverse audience
> than Gnome 1.  I don't think you can  go by past experience here.

no? virtually any linux distribution ships gtk+ for _years_. if experience
accumulating from that doesn't count, i wonder _what_ counts in your book.

---
ciaoTJ