Re: Proposed GtkTreeView API change

[Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>]

Brian Cameron <Brian Cameron Sun COM> writes:

> > I disagree.  We should not be generating a storm of events when a reorder 
> > occurs.  If this is the current gail/atk behavior then we have a problem.
> 
> I do not believe that range_changed ever got generated when row reorders
> or column reorders occur.  I assume that the GtkTreeView
> "columns-changed" signal and the GtkTreeModel "reordered" signal (meaning
> rows) are not being affected by this proposal, or am I wrong?

They aren't being affected.  I don't think it sounds like you guys will
have a problem here.  I'll make this change today.

-Jonathan