Re: CVS branching

[Sebastian Wilhelmi <wilhelmi ira uka de>]

On Sat, 2002-03-16 at 03:18, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com> writes: 
> >  Move aside, 'cvs rm' the old ChangeLog. (That is, take this opportunity
> >  to get rid of excess ChangeLogs)
> >
> 
> I'm very in favor of one ChangeLog per module. It's really annoying to
> dig around for the right one, and to cut-and-paste from more than one
> when commiting.

I have now committed my ChangeLog entry to glib/GhangeLog instead of
glib/gthread/ChangeLog. 

Shouldn't someone go ahead and do: 

mv ChangeLog CangeLog-pre-2-0
cvs rm ChangeLog
cvs add ChangeLog-pre-2-0

include ChangeLog-pre-2-0 into EXTRA_DIST in Makefile.am

cvs commit ChangeLog-pre-2-0 Makefile.am

in the following dirs:

glib/gthread
glib/gobject
glib/gmodule
gtk+/gdk-pixbuf

I'm not so sure about:

gtk+/docs/reference                   [might be a good idea to also move
glib/docs/reference                    them both to a central ChangeLog]
gtk+/contrib/gdk-pixbuf-xlib          [should be probable left alone]
gtk+/po                               [no idea]
glib/po                               [no idea]

I'm pretty sure, we shouldn't do it in

glib/build
gtk+/build
gtk+/intl

as they are external modules linked into gtk+ and glib.

What do you think. Should I go ahead?

Bye,
Sebastian
-- 
Sebastian Wilhelmi
mailto:wilhelmi ira uka de
http://goethe.ira.uka.de/~wilhelmi