Re: AtkHyperlink question

["Padraig O'Briain" <Padraig Obriain Sun COM>]

>   Hi,
> 
> I was going through ATK again and was just wondering about a few 
> inconsistencies.
> 
> 1. Should the return value from 'atk_hyperlink_get_uri' be a 
> G_CONST_RETURN ghar* rather than ghar*.
> 

It would work either way. The way it is requires the caller to call g_free() on 
the returned value to avoid leaking it.

> 2. Should these two fucntion pointers declared in AtkObjectFactoryClass:
> 
> AtkObject* (* create_accessible) (GObject *obj);
> 
> GType (* get_accessible_type) (void);
> 
> actually be
> 
> AtkObject* (* create_accessible) (AtkObjectFactory *factory, GObject *obj);
> 
> GType (* get_accessible_type) (AtkObjectFactory *factory);
> 

It works this way event if it does seem inconsistent.

Padraig

> Jeff.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-devel-list mailing list
> gtk-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list