Light-on-dark color sets and gtk+ [was Re: style->black and style->white]
- From: Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Light-on-dark color sets and gtk+ [was Re: style->black and style->white]
- Date: 13 Nov 2002 12:09:51 +0000
On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:56, Owen Taylor wrote:
>
> Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com> writes:
>
> > If you run one of the "inverse" themes (i.e. HighContrastInverse or
> > HighContrastLargePrintInverse) from gnome-themes, you will notice that
> > readability is negatively affected
...
> > especially
> > troublesome with things like drop-down menus, button borders, WM borders...
> If you want good quality High Contrast themes, there is no
> alternative to providing a theme engine.
This isn't just about high-contrast themes, it concerns any theme that
has dark backgrounds and light foregrounds.
A theme that inverts the meaning of "black" and "white" may well be
pathological, but a theme with light foreground/dark background is not.
It is perfectly reasonable to ask a theme engine (including the default
one) to handle this case well.
> Yeah, we could make GTK+ look just like Motif-1.2. I'm sure that would
> be _real_ popular :-).
Despite what you may think, I am not offering to make GTK+ uglier ;-),
nor am I proposing to do something that would change the way the default
theme/RC-file combination looks. But I am offering to patch the default
engine to make it look better with light-on-dark color sets.
Fixing tbe assumptions about outline and bevel colors would make gtk+'s
default engine work better with non-pathological RC files. I agree that
high-contrast themes can benefit from a special-purpose engine, but one
shouldn't need a new engine just to handle dark backgrounds.
regards,
Bill
> Regards,
> Owen
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]