Re: [Mingw-users] glib and pkg-config build on win2k
- From: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- To: Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi>
- Cc: martyn 2 russell bt com, mingw-users lists sourceforge net, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: [Mingw-users] glib and pkg-config build on win2k
- Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2002 18:16:39 -0500 (EST)
Tor Lillqvist <tml iki fi> writes:
> martyn 2 russell bt com writes:
> > Tell me, why does the configure script for glib require pkg-config?
>
> Umm, good catch. GLib's configure script checks for pkg-config being
> present, but then doesn't ask pkg-config for anything. I was
> flabbergasted.
>
> But then I realized the reasoning is that GLib wants to install it's
> own .pc file, and requires a pkg-config installation so that there is
> somewhere to install it.
>
> > If glib was able to be build without pkg-config, you would then avoid the
> > pkg-config depending on glib and visa versa malarkey.
>
> Indeed. IMHO GLib should not check for pkg-config being present, there
> isn't any harm in installing its .pc file in $libdir/pkgconfig even if
> there is no pkg-config installed on the machine. (Of course, the .pc
> file is useless then, until pkg-config gets installed, but so what.)
The reasoning is that pkg-config is the *only* approved way of
using GLib. There is no way to know what compilation flags to
use for GLib without using pkg-config.
Plus, we need to be able to do version checks on pkg-config.
Is the concern wanting to use the system glib to compile pkg-config
on Windows? Maybe we need a --disable-pkg-config-checks configure
option.
Regards,
Owen
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]