RE: #101293, again
- From: Murray Cumming Comneon com
- To: merchan baton phys lsu edu
- Cc: mitch gimp org, ross burtonini com, gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: #101293, again
- Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 18:54:27 +0100
> > > The reasons
> > > are plainly
> > > > stated in Cooper's About Face 2.0.
> >
> > Lots of us have this book, so an actual section number would be
> > interesting.
>
> Chapter 31: Dialog Etiquette
> Terminating Commands for Modal Dialogs
> The Close Box pg. 415
Thanks, I've never really known what you were going on about before I read
that.
So, I think the point of not having WM-close-buttons is:
- If the dialog has a cancel button, the user expects it to do the same as
the cancel button.
- If the dialog just has a close button (e.g. an instant-apply dialog, maybe
with a revert button), he'll probably expect it to cancel as well, but
there's no such feature.
So it's best not to have the button at all and avoid the confusion.
Note: That section only deals with modal dialogs. I'm not sure why it would
apply only to modal dialogs, and I'm not sure exactly what Gregory's
position is because I seem to have losts half of this thread.
[1] Also known as "close boxes" - the close button on the window's title
bar, which often looks like this: [X].
Murray Cumming
www.murrayc.com
murrayc usa net
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]