Re: Patch to add g_child_watch_source
- From: "Alexis S. L. Carvalho" <alexis cecm usp br>
- To: Jonathan Blandford <jrb redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Patch to add g_child_watch_source
- Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:12:27 -0300
Thus spake Jonathan Blandford:
>
> Comments are appreciated,
(I should've sent this earlier - sorry)
> +static void
> +g_child_watch_signal_handler (int signum)
> +{
> + child_watch_count ++;
> + if (child_watch_init_state == CHILD_WATCH_INITIALIZED_THREADED)
> + {
> + write (child_watch_wake_up_pipe[1], "B", 1);
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + /* We count on the signal interrupting the poll in the same thread.
> + */
> + }
> +}
You probably want to use the same pipe trick even in the single-threaded
case, otherwise you won't notice the signal when it arrives between calls
to poll.
I don't think I understand what you're trying to protect with
child_watch_count...
There's also some cruft left in child_watch_helper_thread , where you
decided to use read instead of poll.
Hope this helps.
Alexis
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]