On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 16:42 +0100, Tim Janik wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Ross Golder wrote: > > > On ÿÿ., 2004-11-16 at 08:54 +0100, Mathieu Lacage wrote: > >> hi, > >> > >> There was no comment to my previous mail to gnome-hackers asking whether > >> I should import or not my gobject documentation into cvs.gnome.org. I > >> take this silence as a yes. Would you mind copying the cvs repository > >> archive located there to cvs.gnome.org in a suitably-named module such > >> as gobject-doc (or whatever you like best) ? > >> > >> http://le-hacker.org/gobject.tar.gz > >> > > > > Couldn't think of a better name, so its now in place as the > > 'gobject-doc' module. > > > > http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/gobject-doc/ > > was there any reason (license? dependencies?) not to have this in glib itself, > or maybe even integrate it into the glib docs? > No real reason (that I know of). If it is deemed more appropriate to be incorporated into an already-existing module, please ask the relevant module maintainer to send/approve a request, and we will move it. Regards,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part