Re: Proposal for 2.8: Glog

[Maciej Katafiasz <ml mathrick org>]

Dnia 04-05-2005, śro o godzinie 11:23 +0300, Tor Lillqvist napisał:
> > Well, standard mode of operation is to redirect everything to stderr,
> > and you can't really change it without custom handler, since you'd like
> > it to output into, well, custom location :). That goes for separate
> > files as well as redirecting to syslog().
> 
> Well, then the current Glog code from Gstreamer needs enhancements
> before it would go in GLib. It doesn't give enough new functionality
> otherwise (IMHO).

Is this really a blocker though? I don't think there's anything that
would require modifications to Glog, just a Simple Matter of Programming
(TM) necessary handlers.

> > I guess we could provide some standard extra handlers out of the
> > box, you'd need to give detailed requirements for them, so someone
> > can code it.
> 
> I don't yet have any more detailled requirements or ideas than what I
> mentioned in my previous message.

I'd appreciate if you (and Stefan, and anyone else who has ideas about
what else needs to go into Glog) put that into
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=303000 in form suitable for
later hacking on feature, so that it doesn't get lost.

Thanks,
Maciej

-- 
Maciej Katafiasz <ml mathrick org>