Re: GLib trees

["Matthias Clasen" <matthias clasen gmail com>]

On 12/26/06, Samuel Cormier-Iijima <sciyoshi gmail com> wrote:
> Hi,

> This, however, is slightly more complicated, and the performance
> benefits would only be noticed in very large sets of data - I wasn't
> sure if GLib was designed for performance or simplicity and
> convenience. Any thoughts on this?

We have always maintained the position that GLib shouldn't provide
more than one implementation of a given data type. See e.g. Owen's
mail from some time ago:

http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2002-March/msg00268.html

Matthias