On Di, 2006-02-28 at 02:18 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote: > The obvious question, any plan to merge efforts with GooCanvas? GooCanvas has taken some decisions for its API that I tried to avoid from the beginning (e.g., having two classes per item-type) to make writing custom items easier (less code, especially an advantage for application developers who prefer to write their apps in C). But, of course, some items from GooCanvas might be worth a port to libccc. In November I was told, that the GooCanvas was just a proof of concept with Damon having not enough time for maintaining a canvas; I think we can sit together and try to get the best off both worlds. Regards, Sven
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part