Re: Fwd: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- From: Tim Janik <timj imendio com>
- To: "ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN" <apaprocki bloomberg net>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <GTK-DEVEL-LIST GNOME ORG>
- Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Depending on C99 (Re: GtkBindingSignal changes)
- Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 16:23:55 +0100 (CET)
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006, ANDREW PAPROCKI, BLOOMBERG/ 731 LEXIN wrote:
I disagree with this completely. We compile all of our code on Solaris/AIX with
SunPRO cc & IBM xlc without c99 extensions enabled for our own reasons.
please tell us what kind of reasons those are. considering and re-evaluating them
is exactly what this thread is for ;)
Code can
take advantage of c99 features, but only if they can be abstracted out in
gmacros/config.h/etc.
Andrew Paprocki
Bloomberg LP
---
ciaoTJ
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]