Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft

[Andreas Nilsson <andreas imendio com>]

Emmanuel Briot wrote:
> > Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
> > I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
> > perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
> >
> > This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
> > that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively
> > checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on
> > there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages.
> >     
>
> Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is
> up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I
> convey this information by some other means to maintainers ?
>   
Fixed!
Please let me know if there are any other bindings that have the wrong 
status (or just fix it directly in svn for those who have a gnome svn 
account).
- Andreas