2008-01-29, 21:39 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote: > On Jan 29, 2008 8:48 PM, Matthias Clasen <matthias clasen gmail com> wrote: > > > > > > > I don't see anything in this message that would explain why the > > > 2.12.6 tarball is over twice the size of the three previous > > > releases (31M for the tar.bz2). What's going on with that? > > > > That is certainly not intentional. I'm looking into this now. > > > > I have no explanation... > > Simply unpacking and recreating the tarballs shrinks them down to the > expected size. The tar file looks like being made.. "cat file.tar file.tar > newfile.tar" It has the same two data concatenated. -- Changwoo Ryu <cwryu debian org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part