Re: Steps to get to GTK+ 3.0

[Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>]

On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:34 +0200, Kristian Rietveld wrote:
[snip]
> We should start to enforce the usage of single header includes and not
> make this optional.  Mitch has been working on this and most is already in
> place in SVN trunk.
[snip]

What's the advantage of this? Has this been a real problem for GTK+ so
far?

Many people (particularly C++ developers) like to reduce pollution of
the global namespace by including as few headers as reasonably possible.
That can also reduce compile times (particularly for C++ developers).

-- 
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com