Am Samstag, den 15.03.2008, 21:48 +0100 schrieb Tim Janik: > On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Andrew Cowie wrote: > > > This topic was discussed recently on foundation-list. > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/foundation-list/2008-March/msg00032.html > > > > In summary, attempting to relicence the library would be, in practise, > > impossible. > > > > No further benefit is gained by discussing this topic further. > > Updating the glib & gtk+ headers to LGPLv3 is not relicensing. Alternative interpretation: You fork under "LGPLv3 or later", as permitted by "LGPLv2.1 or later" and keep "LGPLv3 or later" for the fork. Well, but I am no expert on legal stuff... Ciao, Mathias -- Mathias Hasselmann <mathias hasselmann gmx de> Openismus GmbH: http://www.openismus.com/ Personal Site: http://taschenorakel.de/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil