Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:10:02 +0100
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
> 25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
>
> Hi,
>
> > On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 17:26 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 15:41 +0000, Martyn Russell wrote:
> >>> Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>>> On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 13:16 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote:
> >>>>> And I still believe that the official GNOME bindings deserve to
> >>>>> be in
> >>>>> a
> >>>>> separate section.
> >>>>
> >>>> I see that the site is live already. Please don't just ignore this
> >>>> regression. I've mentioned it before too.
> >>>
> >>> Hi Murray,
> >>>
> >>> We are not ignoring it, it is a planned change. There are one or
> >>> two and
> >>> we have had quite a few improvement requests since going live - we
> >>> will
> >>> be getting to it soon.
> >
> > This still hasn't happened and it's still infuriating me that the page
> > was broken. Why can't I just fix this page as I used to keep it
> > maintained before?
>
> Just a -1 from me regarding splitting out the official GNOME bindings.
>
> I agree that in most cases the quality for only GTK+ is better in
> these
They clearly are and there's no other way to measure their quality, and
no other team of people who are monitoring them, and no other schedule
that you can ask them to follow to ensure their quality in future.
> but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
> bindings include (and require) a wider set of library bindings than GTK
> + bindings.
You're saying it's a disadvantage that bindings for other libraries are
available too.
Really, I give up.
> If you want to split the tables up, I suggest that the split is on up
> to date bindings rather than whether they are in the GNOME bindings
> package. But then again, that is pretty easy to see already.
>
> Maybe just put a little marker on the bindings that are "official"
> GNOME bindings?
>
> ====
> C++ [1]
> C#
> Perl [1]
> ...
>
> [1] Included in the official GNOME bindings.
--
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]