Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft
- From: Mikael Hallendal <micke imendio com>
- To: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Cc: Gtk+ Developers <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GTK+ Website Review - Final Draft
- Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 11:35:12 +0100
26 mar 2008 kl. 11.10 skrev Murray Cumming:
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-03-26 at 10:18 +0100, Mikael Hallendal wrote:
25 mar 2008 kl. 08.58 skrev Murray Cumming:
but it's not given and GTK+ is not only for GNOME. The GNOME
bindings include (and require) a wider set of library bindings than
GTK
+ bindings.
You're saying it's a disadvantage that bindings for other libraries
are
available too.
No, I'm saying that the fact that a binding doesn't include certain
GNOME libraries or follow GNOME release schedule shouldn't move it to
some secondary citizen table for GTK+ which is used widely outside of
GNOME.
For example the C# bindings are not on the GNOME bindings page, even
though it is one of the most used and high quality bindings for GTK+.
Best Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
--
Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]