Re: client-side-windows vs metacity
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>
- Cc: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: client-side-windows vs metacity
- Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2009 10:55:17 +0100
On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 07:43 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> If you get an Inferior leave, you may be losing the ability to track the
> pointer at that point ... the pointer may have disappeared deep into a
> descendant of some foreign child. So I don't see how you can just ignore
> it - it's going to need to be translated into one or more GDK leave and
> enter events. (Depending on the current sprite window tracked by GDK and
> the subwindow field.)
>
> Same for Inferior enters, and in fact virtual enters/leaves as well.
Hmm, this is a bit of a problem. How do you tell the difference from a
virtual leave to an inferior with subwindow NULL to a virtual leave to a
parent (which also sets subwindow to NULL).
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]