Re: client-side-windows vs metacity

[Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Tue, 2009-02-03 at 10:55 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-01-31 at 07:43 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> 
> > If you get an Inferior leave, you may be losing the ability to track the
> > pointer at that point ... the pointer may have disappeared deep into a
> > descendant of some foreign child. So I don't see how you can just ignore
> > it - it's going to need to be translated into one or more GDK leave and
> > enter events. (Depending on the current sprite window tracked by GDK and
> > the subwindow field.)
> > 
> > Same for Inferior enters, and in fact virtual enters/leaves as well.
> 
> Hmm, this is a bit of a problem. How do you tell the difference from a
> virtual leave to an inferior with subwindow NULL to a virtual leave to a
> parent (which also sets subwindow to NULL).

Actually, I think the book i have is not correct. This can't happen,
right? Because in the second case we'd have an virtual enter with parent
NULL.