Re: Glib resource framework
- From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt metux de>
- To: gtk-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Glib resource framework
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2011 05:52:53 +0100
* Michael Urman <murman gmail com> schrieb:
> has changed it. Furthermore a lot of the build process has grown the
> same way, so changing it is even more painful. Nobody has expressed a
> reason to disallow such a change; merely that it is hard to overcome
> the inertia of what has already been coded.
> _______________________________________________
hmm, I realy wonder why it was started this way in the first place.
One argument could be saving resources by loading only the required
stuff. But I really doubt that this argument can stand:
a) its only valid on the assumption that these modules are only
loaded when *really* required (eg. pixmap loading does not probe
all possible formats/loaders, but knows exactly which the
responsible module is, by some separate detection mechanism)
b) pages from shared objects are loaded on-demand anyways,
all that maybe should be done is grouping separate modules
into separate pages.
cu
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/
phone: +49 36207 519931 email: weigelt metux de
mobile: +49 151 27565287 icq: 210169427 skype: nekrad666
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Embedded-Linux / Portierung / Opensource-QM / Verteilte Systeme
----------------------------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]