That's an error for glibc, not glib. You'd be better off talking to the glibc people about that one...
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:32 PM, Daniel Schultze <kinglag gmail com> wrote:
_______________________________________________Hey guys,I'm have a new error with my build. I did some searches which suggested to not use --enable-static-nss which I'm not doing. I did do an edit to one of the awk scripts, scripts/gen-sorted.awk, the build was reporting an error on lines containing /\/[^/]+$/ , so I added an extra backslash in the middle to /\/[^\/]+$/ . Hopefully this edit is unrelated.Here's the error log:isoc99_scanf.c: In function '__isoc99_scanf':isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)isoc99_scanf.c:33: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only onceisoc99_scanf.c:33: error: for each function it appears in.)isoc99_scanf.c: At top level:isoc99_scanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'isoc99_scanf.c:41: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'isoc99_scanf.c:42: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' tokenmake[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_scanf.o] Error 1make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....isoc99_vscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vscanf':isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)isoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only onceisoc99_vscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)isoc99_vscanf.c: At top level:isoc99_vscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'isoc99_vscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'isoc99_vscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' tokenmake[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vscanf.o] Error 1isoc99_fscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_fscanf':isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)isoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only onceisoc99_fscanf.c:31: error: for each function it appears in.)isoc99_fscanf.c: At top level:isoc99_fscanf.c:38: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'isoc99_fscanf.c:39: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'isoc99_fscanf.c:40: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' tokenmake[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_fscanf.o] Error 1isoc99_vfscanf.c: In function '__isoc99_vfscanf':isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: '_IO_acquire_lock_needs_exceptions_enabled' undeclared (first use in this function)isoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only onceisoc99_vfscanf.c:29: error: for each function it appears in.)isoc99_vfscanf.c: At top level:isoc99_vfscanf.c:32: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'while'isoc99_vfscanf.c:33: error: expected identifier or '(' before 'return'isoc99_vfscanf.c:34: error: expected identifier or '(' before '}' tokenmake[2]: *** [/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/build-glibc/stdio-common/isoc99_vfscanf.o] Error 1make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7/stdio-common'make[1]: *** [stdio-common/subdir_lib] Error 2make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/xxx/ltib_xx/rpm/BUILD/glibc-2.7'make: *** [all] Error 2error: Bad exit status from /home/xxx/ltib_xx/tmp/rpm-tmp.15860 (%build)-DanOn Fri, Nov 8, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters <walters verbum org> wrote:
On Fri, 2013-11-08 at 10:28 -0800, Daniel Schultze wrote:From a quick look, this commit to glibc looks like it updated the splice
> The host is Ubuntu 12.04 x86_64, the target CPU is an arm926ejs on a
> Freescale board, using LTIB. It is an older system using glibc 2.5
> with glibc ports 2.5.
prototype:
commit 99ea5991a4957f7a21466a4b48c5020eb70db2b7
Author: Ulrich Drepper <drepper redhat com>
AuthorDate: Wed Aug 30 15:05:29 2006 +0000
* sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/alpha/bits/fcntl.h (splice): Add offin
Which as you can see is really quite ancient.
That's probably fine as a fix for you for now, this issue will go away
> --- glib-2.28.7.orig/configure 2011-05-20 21:15:25.000000000 -0700
> +++ glib-2.28.7/configure 2013-11-08 10:15:51.380683520 -0800
> @@ -23107,7 +23107,6 @@
> ac_fn_c_check_func "$LINENO" "splice" "ac_cv_func_splice"
> if test "x$ac_cv_func_splice" = xyes; then :
> cat >>confdefs.h <<_ACEOF
> -#define HAVE_SPLICE 1
> _ACEOF
when you update to a version of glibc from this decade too =)
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list gnome org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
--
Jasper