Re: Problem with 'gio/gwin32appinfo.c'

[Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi gmail com>]

Hi;

On 24 June 2015 at 10:46, John Emmas <johne53 tiscali co uk> wrote:

> So what needs to happen here?  Do the placeholder functions need to get put
> back?  Or does somebody need to flag this up to the glibmm team so they can
> accommodate the change at their end?  Thanks.

Since this is an ABI break, those function stubs should go back in.

Ideally, an implementation would follow; if not, we can think about
deprecating those entry points and replacing them with other API that
can be implemented on Windows as well.

Ciao,
 Emmanuele.

-- 
https://www.bassi.io
[ ] ebassi [ gmail com]