Re: [Discuss] Make a thinner Glib/GTK+ to fit tiny device better




-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Hi all:

El 14/10/15 a las 21:16, Matthias Clasen escribió:
>
>     We (taking my GStreamer hat) havent heard of any interest from the GLib
>     group for lightweight objects. Note that some library ended up also
>     having these lightweight kind of object, hence may be interesting to
>     eventually consolidate.
>
>
> I think it is fair to say that there is more interest in fixing performance of GObject than there is in introducing a miniobject type. Not sure if that qualifies as 'interest in lightweight objects' or not.


In fact, "compact classes" in vala can qualify as lightweight objects, isn't it? They are nothing more than a struct and some functions, and to do that, you don't need help from GObject.

- --
Nos leemos
                 RASTER    (Linux user #228804)
raster rastersoft com              http://www.rastersoft.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=NBHw
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]