Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement
- From: Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
- To: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg gnome org>
- Cc: "gtk-devel-list gnome org Developers" <gtk-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: GnomeDesktopThumbnail API replacement
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:03:39 +0100
On Mon, 2018-01-22 at 15:22 +0100, Carlos Garnacho wrote:
Hey,
On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 6:15 PM, Bastien Nocera <hadess hadess net>
wrote:
On Wed, 2018-01-17 at 13:15 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Hey,
I wanted to start a discussion about replacing
GnomeDesktopThumbnail
with an API that would live in the GLib/GTK+ stack.
<snip>
To sum up, here are the questions:
- Do we want the API in GTK+ and depending on gdk-pixbuf, even if
it's
only really meant to be used on "freedesktop" platforms?
- Are there specific API entry points that people need besides
the
current API (including [1]) with async support?
This is the API that I came up with, which could live in either
gdk-
pixbuf, or GTK+, dependency-wise. It might also be small enough to
copy/paste although I count 15 users of just the C API in Debian
Codesearch[1], so it might be worth having in a shared library
anyway.
typedef enum {
GNOME_DESKTOP_THUMBNAIL_FLAGS_NONE = 0,
GNOME_DESKTOP_THUMBNAIL_FLAGS_SAVE, // Whether to save the
created (successful or failed) thumbnail to the cache
} GnomeDesktopThumbnailFlag;
#define GNOME_DESKTOP_THUMBNAIL_FILE_ATTRIBUTES \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_THUMBNAIL_PATH "," \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_THUMBNAILING_FAILED "," \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_THUMBNAIL_IS_VALID "," \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_PREVIEW_ICON "," \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_TIME_MODIFIED "," \
G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_STANDARD_FAST_CONTENT_TYPE
// About @info:
// NULL means we'll look it up if necessary, otherwise must include
// GNOME_DESKTOP_THUMBNAIL_FILE_ATTRIBUTES,
// G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_STANDARD_CONTENT_TYPE will however be used
rather
// than G_FILE_ATTRIBUTE_STANDARD_FAST_CONTENT_TYPE if present
GdkPixbuf *
gnome_desktop_thumbnail_generate_thumbnail_sync
(GnomeDesktopThumbnailFactory *factory,
GFile
*file, // instead of a URI?
GFileInfo
*info,
GnomeDesktopThumbn
ailFlags flag,
char
**ret_thumbnail_path,
GError
**error);
Maybe having both operations split (#1 generating the thumbnail, #2
loading it as a GdkPixbuf) might help see the layer to which each
more
clearly belongs?
I don't think it's really helpful. If you chose not to save the
thumbnail for example (maybe for privacy reasons?), you'd end up with
nothing. This also makes it more difficult to use the macOS APIs, which
just give back an image, and doesn't have any easily accessible caches.
macOS:
https://developer.apple.com/library/content/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/Quicklook_Programming_Guide/Articles/QLDrawGraphContext.html#//apple_ref/doc/uid/TP40005020-CH8-SW4
The Windows API requires to save the thumbnail in the cache, if you
want to lookup whether a thumbnail already exists in the cache.
Windows:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/19523599/how-to-get-thumbnail-of-file-using-the-windows-api
Both the Windows and macOS APIs also seem to use their own image
formats. Will we want to convert those to GdkPixbuf? Or pass them back
as NativeImage opaque pointers for each platform?
GdkPixbuf generation from a GFile(Info) might easily
be gdk-pixbuf or gtk+ helpers, thumbnail generation requests might be
into a separate library, or behind a GIO interface.
Cheers,
Carlos
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]