Re: status gtk-doc towards 1.9
- From: Stefan Kost <ensonic hora-obscura de>
- To: "David Nečas (Yeti)" <yeti physics muni cz>
- Cc: gtk-doc-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: status gtk-doc towards 1.9
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 21:58:49 +0300
Hi David,
David Nečas (Yeti) wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 01:47:12PM +0200, Stefan Kost wrote:
>> and I've started a testsuite to help us improving
>> without regressions.
>
> How to add a test case for getting a WARNING when one wants
> one? IMO this is equally important to not getting WARNINGS
> on valid code and documentation.
>
The current test suite has two suites right now
gobject - this should be an example that demonstrates all capabillities
bugs - have examples that failed before to catch regressions
Maybe we need another that has samples that should not causes warnings. This
suite should run with a different driver-script (one that fails if there are no
warnings).
Stefan
>
> Yeti
>
> --
> http://gwyddion.net/
> _______________________________________________
> gtk-doc-list mailing list
> gtk-doc-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-doc-list
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]