Re: status gtk-doc towards 1.9

[David Nečas (Yeti) <yeti physics muni cz>]

On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 09:58:49PM +0300, Stefan Kost wrote:
> >
> The current test suite has two suites right now
> gobject - this should be an example that demonstrates all capabillities
> bugs - have examples that failed before to catch regressions
> 
> Maybe we need another that has samples that should not causes warnings.

s/should not/should/ ?

> This
> suite should run with a different driver-script (one that fails if there are no
> warnings).

Hm, wouldn't it be better to include the files and warnings
generated by a known good gtk-doc run (manually checked) in
the suite and diff the actual results?

Yeti

--
http://gwyddion.net/