Re: [pygtk] gnome-python split proposal
- From: "Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro" <gjc inescporto pt>
- To: PyGTK <pygtk daa com au>
- Cc: James Henstridge <james jamesh id au>, language-bindings gnome org, Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- Subject: Re: [pygtk] gnome-python split proposal
- Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2004 21:22:46 +0100
I just realized that there is a project called python-gtkextra, so
pygtk-extra is bound to cause some confusion. Any ideas for alternative
names? Does gnome-python-extra sound good? Any other idea? Thanks.
A Sáb, 2004-08-28 às 18:07, Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro escreveu:
> I would like to know what the pygtk/gnome community thinks about
> splitting gnome-python, according to the following plan:
>
> - gnome-python keeps the modules that are part of gnome developer
> platform[1]:
> o gnome, gnome.ui, gnome.vfs, gnome.canvas
> o bonobo, bonobo.activation, bonobo.ui
> o gconf
>
> - We create a new pygtk-extra package containing everything else,
> including:
> o gnome.applet
> o gnome.nautilus
> o gtkhtml2
> o gnomeprint, gnomeprint.ui
>
> At this point we would have more liberty to add other useful modules
> to pygtk-extra, such as:
> o pygtksourceview
> o some libegg stuff (tray, recent-files, ...)
> o gtkspell
> o ...
>
> I believe this split leaves gnome-python in a better position for
> inclusion in the next gnome bindings release.
>
> [1] http://www.gnome.org/start/2.7/platform/
>
> Regards.
--
Gustavo J. A. M. Carneiro
<gjc inescporto pt> <gustavo users sourceforge net>
The universe is always one step beyond logic
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]