RE: Python binding and Gnome binding

[Murray Cumming Comneon com]

> I've discussed a bit with the python binding team

Have you discussed this with James Henstridge, the gnome-python maintainer?

> about the 
> biggest issues with gnome binding rules. The common feeling 
> is that gnome-python package is ok as it is with modules from 
> both developer and desktop Gnome.

I have gone over this several times. Have you seen the previous discussion?

> Again, the configuration 
> only compiles what is detected on the system. Therefore one 
> doesn't need to install any desktop library to bind the 
> developer part.
> 
> Versions number can be bounced to match the gnome binding 
> rule but will not be before gnome python is planned in gnome binding.
> 
> The API stability and different versions on the same machine 
> are already able with the pygtk.require We may need to work a 
> bit more on it but it proved to be working well with 
> maintaining both gtk 1.2 and 2.0 bindings.
> 
> Work will start to include the missing parts since gnome 2.0
> 
> I'm not asking inclusion in gnome binding 2.6, I'm just 
> asking if the above points sounds ok to you or not for later 
> inclusion.
> 
> Regards,
> Xavier Ordoquy.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> language-bindings mailing list  language-bindings gnome org 
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/lang> uage-bindings
>