Re: Introspection API

On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 15:20 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>I have written up a draft spec for the format of the binary metadata
>to back up the repository api which I posted earlier. I hope to have
>some initial code implementing both of these soon.

  guint             caller_owns_return_value     : 1;

Do we also want to have a pointer to a "release function"?  I assume
with XPCOM since it's C++ they can just use "delete", but we can't do
that, right?

Also, I think it would be nice if we had a standard way to map from a
FunctionBlob -> possible GError domains it throws.  Or maybe even a set
of specific domain/code pairs.  Or should that just be a standard
annotation or something?

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]