Re: [Nautilus-list] Nautilus 1.0.3 (possibly 1.2?)

[Josh Barrow <josh whitecape org>]

Darin,

If 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 were just translation fixes and i18n fixes, it makes 
it look like 1.0.3 is the same.

Josh


On Sunday, April 22, 2001, at 11:35 AM, Darin Adler wrote:

> on 4/21/01 11:58 PM, Josh Barrow at josh whitecape org wrote:
>
> > I propose that we call Nautilus 1.0.3, Nautilus 1.2.  I feel that all 
> > of
> > these changes warrant the upped version number.  If these changes don't
> > warrant it, what would?
>
> I have three thoughts:
>
>     1) We originally planned to call this release Nautilus 1.2, then I
> backed off to 1.0.2 when I decided that it was better to not claim this 
> was
> a major upgrade. "Under-promise, over-deliver" is a good motto.
>     2) It would be fine with me if we want to change our minds as a 
> team,
> and call it 1.2, but I'm not sure how to make the decision. Hearing 
> opinions
> here on the mailing list is OK, but I'm not certain that's enough to 
> make an
> informed choice.
>     3) I don't think any of these changes constitute major features. 
> They
> feel more like tuning to me, with a few small features. A major feature 
> for
> me would be something that makes a significant change in day-to-day use 
> for
> an average user who isn't doing anything fancy. But I don't think it's 
> worth
> arguing this point. Everyone has their own threshold for what they 
> think are
> major features.
>
> I think I've heard enough "pro" arguments for calling it 1.2. Any "con"
> arguments for calling it 1.0.3?
>
>     -- Darin
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nautilus-list mailing list
> Nautilus-list lists eazel com
> http://lists.eazel.com/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list