Re: New toolbar button ordering



Hello,

On Wed, 2002-05-01 at 12:47, Calum Benson wrote:
> David Emory Watson wrote:
> 
> > > However, I think it's easy enough to change both Nautilus and the HIG
> > > (which is not finished yet), if everyone agrees with the proposed
> > > change.
> > 
> > I think this is a good idea.  Calum, what do you think?
> 
> 
> I'm all for any change that's demonstrably better than what's in the
> HIG... whether this one is or not is kind of hard to judge without the
> kind of testing we sadly don't have time to do right now :)
> 
> Any comments Matthew (since it was you who originally pointed out that
> Stop ought to be as near Back, Forward and Reload as possible)... what
> button ordering is Mozilla likely to be going forward with?  (If you'll
> pardon the pun...)
> 

Matthew hasn't commented on this yet, but I don't think Mozilla is going
to change at this point. It has Back, Forward, Reload and Stop buttons,
in that order.

Ok, back to Nautilus. Currently, the HIG says:

"Similarly, the first few buttons in a browser application should always
include Back, Forward, Stop and Reload, in that order."

Do you agree to change the order to Back, Forward, Reload and Stop (as
used by Nautilus 1.x, Galeon, Mozilla and Konqueror)?

The updates necessary to the HIG is in that paragraph and in the files
images/GaleonToolbar.png and images/GtkToolbar_browserdefault.png,
AFAICT.


> Cheeri,
> Calum.
> 
> -- 
> CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer       Sun Microsystems Ireland
> mailto:calum benson ireland sun com    Desktop Engineering Group
> http://www.sun.ie                      +353 1 819 9771
> 
> Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems
> -- 
> nautilus-list mailing list
> nautilus-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list

--
Evandro



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]