Re: Feature Request
- From: Sriram Ramkrishna <sri aracnet com>
- To: Raul Acevedo <raul cantara com>
- Cc: Christophe Fergeau <teuf gnome org>, nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Feature Request
- Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2004 16:17:09 -0700
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 10:54:35AM -0700, Raul Acevedo wrote:
> Christophe Fergeau wrote:
>
> > Please, can you read the whole thread (come on, it's 10 mails,
> > shouldn't take that much time) before asking for those "spatial
> > settings" ? I'd recommend in particular the second mail:
> > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/nautilus-list/2004-June/msg00107.html
>
> And people wonder why developers don't get "users". Sigh.
The current stuff only serves to break the spatial feature. If you
implemented it wouldn't be spatial anymore it's more of a runaround to
get spatial to act more like a browser. Maybe it would be better to just
make the browser portion better.
Spatial does require you manage your data differently. For instance,
as an old unix hat I don't have directories with any depth greater
than 4. Mostly because I don't like typing more than that. I don't
see how anybody would want to type long paths..
Before spatial I hardly used nautilus because I tended to use nautilus
to do file operations and browser mode sucked for that. I use it a lot
more now and it's great! Try it for awhile.
Anyways, retrofitting spatial into something it's not isn't the right
solution.
sri
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]