Ok, thanks for the explanation. If I'm correct, with your patch in text-besides-icon mode, the maximum width of icon labels is 90 pixels (at 100% zoom). This is not affected by the font size. The "regular" size of icons (again, at 100% zoom) is 48*48 pixels. So in the text-besides-icon mode icon + label ~ 150 pixels. Add in some padding for esthetic reasons, and you get a grid size of ~ 160 pixels horizontally. If the actual gridsize is 210 pixels, your suggestion to decrease it makes a lot of sense. (please someone correct me if I'm forgetting a scale factor or something here). I really don't like reasoning in pixels. I just tried a 160 pixels width and it looks much nicer. See first screenshot. HOWEVER, while doing this I think I ran into the reason for the 210-pixels grid : thumbnails. If you set the grid size at 160 pixels, the alignment of thumbnails is screwed. See second screenshot. This is due to the way nautilus computes the position of icons one at a time, right ? If nautilus would compute the sizes for all icons in a window in one row, it would be fairly easy to align everything. However, in the current way of doing things, I don't really see how to solve this... :-( Cheers On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 17:33:44 +0100, Iain * <iaingnome gmail com> wrote: > Because of two things. > Firstly when tight layout is turned off (we'll call this grid mode for > simplicity) icons are laid out in a fixed width grid of 210 pixels. > So, every icon will have at least 210 pixels width for this. > > Secondly, the only way to guarentee a consistant baseline for the left > hand side of the text like we want is to right align the text to the > edge of the icon. So, text will always be right aligned to the 210th > pixel. > > Times when this causes a problem: > a) Your case where there's lots of very small icons > b) when the icon's width is actually just over 210 pixels, in which > case the icon gets allocated 420 pixels (the next multiple of the grid > size) and so in the case of say an icon being 215 pixels wide, you end > up with 205 pixels blank space. > > I think that maybe shrinking the grid size might make this work > better, but the more you shrink the grid size, the harder it is to see > the grid and so as grid_size decreases, untidyness increases and > eventually, you get it that grid mode and tight mode are actually the > same thing. > > But I would suggest maybe dropping the gridsize to 100 - 150pixels? > Just to see if that makes things better. > > iain > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:58:50 -0400, Vincent Noel <vincent noel gmail com> wrote: > > Sorry, I meant columns and not rows. > > > > I have attached a screenshot that shows the gap. > > Cheers > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 09:48:28 -0400, Vincent Noel <vincent noel gmail com> wrote: > > > This is perfect. > > > > > > > Well, almost : why is there a big white space between each row of > > > icons (and even at the left of the first row) ? I'm sure there's a > > > sensible reason, but I can't figure it out. > > > Thanks for this, the text-besides-icon mode looks good now. > > > Cheers > > > Vincent > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 00:33:36 +0100, Iain * <iaingnome gmail com> wrote: > > > > Done... > > > > iain > > > > > > > > On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 18:22:47 -0400, Dave Camp <dave novell com> wrote: > > > > > Yeah. I think the code that's there does a baseline well assuming you > > > > > > > > > > > > > don't have any stretched icons. That's probably the best bet - > > > > > stretched icons are a fairly rare corner case. > > > > > > > > > > -dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 23:05 +0100, Iain * wrote: > > > > > > Actually, I've been thinking about this, and the current way that > > > > > > nautilus lays out icons wouldn't (unless I'm mistaken) be able to do > > > > > > this. Each row is laid out and drawn, and works down, which means that > > > > > > the very first row that is laid out would be the baseline setter for > > > > > > each column, and if an icon was bigger than this baseline, it would > > > > > > push icons about all wrong. > > > > > > > > > > > > I'll think about this at more length... > > > > > > > > > > > > iain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:38:46 -0400, Dave Camp <dave novell com> wrote: > > > > > > > Ideally we want a vertical baseline on the left hand side of the text, > > > > > > > similar to the horizontal baseline above it in normal mode. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 16:29 +0100, Iain * wrote: > > > > > > > > Hmm, yes... > > > > > > > > Do we want the text labels aligned, or the icons aligned? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > iain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 11:24:14 -0400, Vincent Noel <vincent noel gmail com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > The patch improves a lot the display in text-besides-icon, but the > > > > > > > > > icons are vertically misaligned. When there's only a single column of > > > > > > > > > icons it's kind of obvious (see the attached screenshot). Is this on > > > > > > > > > purpose ? > > > > > > > > > Note that even with the misalignment it's still better than before. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 06 Oct 2004 11:07:14 -0400, Dave Camp <dave novell com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Looks good, please commit. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -dave > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 10:38 +0100, Iain * wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > With the recent comments on the text beside icons style I took a look > > > > > > > > > > > at making it a bit neater. Attached is a patch that lines the icons > > > > > > > > > > > and text along a centre line down the middle of the tallest icon. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > An also semi-related change is this > > > > > > > > > > > - position->x_offset = (MAXIMUM_IMAGE_SIZE - > > > > > > > > > > > (icon_bounds.x1 - icon_bounds.x0)); > > > > > > > > > > > + position->x_offset = (icon_width - (bounds.x1 > > > > > > > > > > > - bounds.x0)) / 2 + ICON_PAD_LEFT; > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It is possible to have an icon that is larger than MAXIMUM_IMAGE_SIZE > > > > > > > > > > > if you are viewing the desktop folder as a normal folder and have > > > > > > > > > > > stretched an icon. This change lines it up correctly. The > > > > > > > > > > > ICON_PAD_LEFT is added because there was no padding for icons in this > > > > > > > > > > > style. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Enjoy, iain > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > nautilus-list mailing list > > > > > > > > > > nautilus-list gnome org > > > > > > > > > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/nautilus-list > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
Attachment:
shot-1.jpg
Description: JPEG image
Attachment:
shot-2.jpg
Description: JPEG image
