Re: Wrong icons on nautilus-gio
- From: Alexander Larsson <alexl redhat com>
- To: Luca Ferretti <elle uca libero it>
- Cc: nautilus-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Wrong icons on nautilus-gio
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:29:55 +0100
On Wed, 2008-01-09 at 12:36 +0100, Luca Ferretti wrote:
> * All archive (zip, tgz, tbz, rmp(?), deb(?)...) files show the
> regular file icon. They should use instead
> "package-x-generic"[1]
> * All fonts file could/should use "font-x-generic"
> * HTML files could/should use "text-html"
> * PDF and PS files are using regular file icon. Why not
> "x-office-document"? (of course when you disable the preview)
> * same for MS Office, OpenOffice.org 1 and 2, Gnumeric and Abiword
> files: please use x-office-[document,presentation,spreadsheet]
> * shell script files (and maybe Python, Perl, Ruby...)
> should/could use "text-x-script" icon. Note that when you enable
> the +x, Nautilus uses "application-x-executable".
> * .vcf files could/should use "x-office-address-book" icon (same
> for other file formats to store contacts)
> * .ics files could/should use "x-office-calendar" icon (same for
> other file formats to store events)
At the moment we're only using the mimetypes to generate the icons. So,
for for example zip files (application/zip) we use application-zip, then
application-x-generic, then text-x-generic as a final fallback.
It would be very nice if we could for instance group all archives, all
fonts or all documents into one group and have a common fallback icon
for those. However, this information doesn't currently exist anywhere in
the shared-mime-info information. I've proposed adding a generic icon
attribute to this a long time ago, but nothing has really happened on
that. Should be easy to do though.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]