Re: [Planner Dev] lag & more

[Kurt Maute <Kurt Maute us>]

On Wed, 2004-07-28 at 12:50, lincoln phipps openmutual net wrote:
> Andrej Vodopivec wrote:
> > The single thing that stands out is predecessor lag time.
> > User guide says:
> > "Finally, you can enter a lag time for the relationship, which 
> > represents the
> > number of days after the relationship has been satisfied."
> 
> Thats not right ! and its actually hours and not days; when you add
> a link and set the lag then the value you add into the dialog is
> actually an hourly figure, though its stored in the memory/xml
> as a usual planner time i.e. in  seconds (1 in the dialog stored as 3600)

Interesting.  I'm not sure how that one got by me, considering that I
remember discussing the issue of lag time being in hours more than once
on this list in the past.  

I'll update the user guide.

-- 
Kurt Maute <Kurt Maute us>