Re: [Planner Dev] Prop. for new feat. - first patch

[Richard Hult <richard imendio com>]

Hi,

Carsten Klein wrote:

> The project should know of only tasks and various states of tasks rather 
> than actually distinguish
> between additional different types of tasks.

I'm just talking about the naming scheme in the code though. The UI
shouldn't have a name for this in my opinion, it's just a task with a
high priority that should get scheduled before other tasks.

It might even be good enough for the code to just talk about priorities
too. And any task with a priority higher than other tasks, will
"vampire" on those lower priority tasks. What do you think about that
Matteo?

/Richard

-- 
Imendio AB, http://www.imendio.com/