El lun, 11-08-2003 a las 17:46, Christian Rose escribió: > mån 2003-08-11 klockan 17.39 skrev Carlos Perelló Marín: > > > Btw, in this way we are just banning SUN gettext completely :-) > > > > Hmmm If they don't fix the UTF-8 source code issue, they are banned > > already. They idea behind intltool is that we add there anything that > > is not inside gettext, when gettext implements it, we should remove > > that file format from intltool. > > > > Perhaps we could write a test, if it's SUN gettext, just call the old > > intltool code, if it's GNU gettext, we just relay on gettext. If there > > is any problem with the old support, SUN will fix it (if they want), we > > should not duplicate work just because a closed software does not do > > somethig. GNU gettext works on Sun Solaris, so, if they don't implement > > what we need, just compile GNU gettext. > > Would it not make sense to discuss this on the public xml-i18n-tools > list instead of in private? Sorry, my fault. Although we were not trying to decide anything jet, we are talking with Sun guys (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119613) to know the actual status of SUN gettext. I don't know if there is another implementation that we should care about. And of course, we are not the intltool maintainer so Kenneth is who should take any decision. That's only my ideas. Cheers. > > > Christian > -- just worrying that things will be decided in private without insight -- Carlos Perelló Marín Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) Linux Registered User #121232 mailto:carlos pemas net || mailto:carlos gnome org http://carlos.pemas.net Valencia - Spain
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Esta parte del mensaje =?ISO-8859-1?Q?est=E1?= firmada digitalmente