On 2003-08-11(Mon) 17:52:48 +0200, Carlos Perelló Marín wrote: > > Would it not make sense to discuss this on the public xml-i18n-tools > > list instead of in private? > > Sorry, my fault. <notAOL>me too.</notAOL> > Although we were not trying to decide anything jet, we are talking with > Sun guys (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119613) to know the > actual status of SUN gettext. I don't know if there is another > implementation that we should care about. The discussion was about dropping intltool's support of glade 1 XML file, in favor of the implementation from GNU gettext. Of course nothing would be decided, it's just a discussion. In the end it'll be Kenneth to decide the direction of intltool. Abel > And of course, we are not the intltool maintainer so Kenneth is who > should take any decision. That's only my ideas. > > Cheers. > > > > > > > Christian > > -- just worrying that things will be decided in private without insight > -- > Carlos Perelló Marín > Debian GNU/Linux Sid (PowerPC) > Linux Registered User #121232 > mailto:carlos pemas net || mailto:carlos gnome org > http://carlos.pemas.net > Valencia - Spain -- Abel Cheung Linux counter #256983 | http://counter.li.org GPG Key: (0xC67186FF) | http://deaddog.org/gpg.asc Key fingerprint: 671C C7AE EFB5 110C D6D1 41EE 4152 E1F1 C671 86FF
Attachment:
pgpvgAS0QT0iN.pgp
Description: PGP signature