Re: Compilation problems. GdkPixbuf
- From: Jules Bean <jules jellybean co uk>
- To: Martin Leopold <mleopold worldonline dk>
- Cc: balsa-list gnome org
- Subject: Re: Compilation problems. GdkPixbuf
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 13:27:38 +0000
On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 09:09:34PM +0100, Martin Leopold wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:02:18 Peter Bloomfield wrote:
> > On my system (up2date RH7.2 + various), gdk-pixbuf/gdk-pixbuf.h is
> > included from /usr/include/libgnomeprint/gnome-print.h:5, so maybe you
> > should also check gnomeprint..
>
> Ah. This seems to be the problem. The file on the newbox doesn't include
> this line.
>
> On th old box the files comes from the package:
> libgnomeprint-dev: /usr/include/libgnomeprint/gnome-print.h
> Version 0.28
>
> On the new box dpkg -S gnomeprint.h shows:
> libgnomeprint-dev: /usr/include/gnome-1.0/libgnomeprint/gnome-print.h
> gnome-print: /usr/include/libgnomeprint/gnome-print.h
>
> gnome-print - version 0.10
> libgnomeprint-dev - version 0.32
>
> Hmm.. What's going on here? Are the Debian maintainers anticipating gnome
> 2.0??
Not the debian maintainers, no. The gnome people. All gnome headers
are moving to gnome-1.0 to make room for (as you rightly guessed)
gnome 2.
I suggest you make sure you have the latest versions of everything.
gnome-print 0.10 is very out of date: apt-get install
libgnomeprint-bin libgnomeprint-data libgnomeprint-dev. If necessary,
remove gnome-print by hand.
Alternatively, if you're using debian unstable you could just apt-get
install balsa ;-)
Jules
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]