Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT

[Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>]

jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs.  however, in gnome 2 i am
> hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> these if bug-buddy caught them too.
> 
> any reasons not to do this?
> 

If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
betas ;-)

j/k

Havoc