Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT

[Sander Vesik <sv117949 ireland sun com>]

On 1 Mar 2002, Havoc Pennington wrote:

> 
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs.  however, in gnome 2 i am
> > hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> > these if bug-buddy caught them too.
> > 
> > any reasons not to do this?
> > 
> 
> If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
> you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
> betas ;-)

It may be a tiny bit too early, but I don't think there is another way...

> 
> j/k
> 
> Havoc
> 

	Sander

	I see a dark sail on the horizon
	Set under a dark cloud that hides the sun
	Bring me my Broadsword and clear understanding