Re: having bug-buddy catch SIGABRT

[Luis Villa <louie ximian com>]

On Fri, 2002-03-01 at 15:04, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> 
> jacob berkman <jacob ximian com> writes:
> > currently bug-buddy only catches SEGVs.  however, in gnome 2 i am
> > hitting a lot of failed assertions and it would be easier to report
> > these if bug-buddy caught them too.
> > 
> > any reasons not to do this?
> > 
> 
> If you really want to piss Luis off and make people fix their stuff,
> you could make gnome_program_init() set --g-fatal-warnings during the
> betas ;-)

Bring it on :)
Luis