RE: Addition of two new modules under cvs.gnome.org

[Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>]

On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Shivram U wrote:

> Hi Havoc,
> 
> > It's fine to keeping these in CVS, but getting them into the GNOME
> > module list will probably require an answer to the question "why
> > didn't you just port procman to support Solaris" (for the ProcView
> > one).
> >
> > Havoc
> 
> Keeping these in CVS should be fine. This way interested developers can
> access them and work on the same.
> The reason i didnt port procman to support Solaris is because procman
> depends on libgtop and i took out the dependency with gprocview.
> Ofcourse these are still in the infancy stage and have a long way to go to
> get into the GNOME module list.

You took out the porting layer and then you expect the rest of the 
community to fix the fact that your app only works on solaris?
Seems a bit strange to me.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
 Alexander Larsson                                            Red Hat, Inc 
                   alexl redhat com    alla lysator liu se 
He's a fast talking overambitious dwarf from the Mississippi delta. She's a 
mentally unstable belly-dancing femme fatale on her way to prison for a murder 
she didn't commit. They fight crime!