RE: GEP-2 (metathemer)
- From: snickell stanford edu
- To: Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>
- Cc: Calum Benson <calum benson sun com>, Bill Haneman <bill haneman sun com>, campd ximian com, Seth Nickell <snickell stanford edu>, dobey free fr, Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>, Alex Larsson <alexl redhat com>, Owen Taylor <otaylor redhat com>, Glynn Foster <glynn foster sun com>, Suzanna Smith <suzanna smith sun com>, desktop-devel-list gnome org
- Subject: RE: GEP-2 (metathemer)
- Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2002 13:51:11 -0700
I don't think themes SHOULD be able to make an arbitrary set of changes.
I'll not go into the arguments again, but I think its asking for bad
usability (even if we aren't the ones that directly incur it but theme
authors).
-Seth
Quoting Michael Meeks <michael ximian com>:
> On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 19:53, Calum Benson wrote:
> > I think my main concern is about the 'extensibility' aspect...
> allowing
> > a theme to specify arbitrary(ish) Gconf pairs is a neat idea and
> easy
> > enough to design a UI for, but unfortunately in the real world most
> apps
> > aren't themeable via GConf...
>
> Sure; but of course - it's pretty easy for a theme to provide a set
> of
> gconf key/value pairs:
>
> [snip: theme_foo_gconf_pairs]
> # Turn off the taskbar
> /foo/bar/taskbar FALSE
>
> # No nautilus frobnication
> /foo/bar/frobincation FALSE
> [/snip]
>
> etc. without having really any impact on the UI; at least that's how
> I
> read the requirement - which seems excellent to me since I hadn't
> thought of it ;-)
>
> Regards,
>
> Michael.
>
> --
> mmeeks gnu org <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
>
> _______________________________________________
> desktop-devel-list mailing list
> desktop-devel-list gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
>
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]