On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 22:54, Sean Middleditch wrote: > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 16:12, Andrew Sobala wrote: > > On Tue, 2003-09-16 at 04:58, Seth Nickell wrote: > > > On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 13:10, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > > > * You are actually making the Nautilus model more complicated (not > > > > simpler) by exposing the user to two completely different kinds > > > > of windows, for "object" and "navigation" purposes. This seems > > > > to defeat the basic premise of making the model easier to learn. > > > > > > It makes the Nautilus model more complicated for users who choose to > > > work through the navigator. > > > > The navigator is the *only* way to get to devices in /mnt. > > Which is a bug. Devices in /mnt shouldn't need navigation - the user > should be able to simple open removable volumes. Refusing one possible > interface design simply because of another unsolved but certainly > solvable interface problem is a bit silly. > > There's already a discussion going on accessing these media, lets see > how well that can tie in with spatial navigation - we may be surprised. > Or find out it still sucks. Won't know till we try, tho. ;-) I'm not refusing the interface design, I'm pointing out a problem with it. If we can fix that with easy ways to get to devices, that's great. -- Andrew Sobala <aes gnome org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part