Re: Scripting in Gnome
- From: Kjartan Maraas <kmaraas broadpark no>
- To: jamie <jamiemcc blueyonder co uk>
- Cc: Sean Middleditch <elanthis awesomeplay com>, GNOME Desktop Hackers <desktop-devel-list gnome org>
- Subject: Re: Scripting in Gnome
- Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:35:38 +0100
tor, 05.02.2004 kl. 18.59 +0100, skrev Kjartan Maraas:
> tor, 05.02.2004 kl. 16.51 +0000, skrev jamie:
> > On Thu, 2004-02-05 at 16:16, Sean Middleditch wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > What makes you think D-Bus is any faster than CORBA? We already have
> > > one backend that does everything we need it to already, so why do we
> > > need alternatives? What advantages do we get for all that extra
> > > development time and complexity? What about the fact that apps would
> > > then no longer inter-operate because some would use backend A and others
> > > use backend B?
> > >
> > The fact that slow bloated KDE thought the Corba implementation in Gnome
> > was slow and heavy on memory usage and hence decided not to use it
> > speaks for itself.
> >
> KDE never tried to use the CORBA implementation that is in GNOME. They
> used Mico in their early days and so did GNOME. Elliot Smith implemented
Blush, Elliot Lee, sorry about that Elliot, music was on my mind ;-)
Cheers
Kjartan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]